oil

Global Resource Corporation, a small company in New Jersey that has built and successfully tested a machine that extracts oil, diesel fuel and fuel oil from waste products like used tires, plastics, tar sands, slurry, shale rock and capped off oil wells. There are lots of companies that do similar things. This company is the only one that uses a microwave technology that uses NO water and has zero emissions. The whole proccess is done in a vacuum. Extracting oil from oil shale has been around for a long time. It's just to expensive using the old methods. The microwaves break down the shale rock, old tires, etc... at the hydrocarbon levels and the only thing left is the oil, diesel and gas. In and interview with the founder, Frank Pringle, on FOX News he said that he takes the diesel fuel straight from the machine and pours it right into his car. No refining required. That means no wasted energy, no environmental concerns at all. In the interview Mr. Pringle stated this country throughs away over 7 million tires a year. His machine can extract 1.5 gallons of diesel fuel from one (1) tire. The FOX interviewer was aw-struck making him repeat the statement several times. Slurry is the oil that's left in wells because it's to thick to pump up. A microwave device can be lowered into the well to break down the slurry and it can then be pumped up easily. It's estimated there is enough shale rock right here in the U.S. that if we extracted all the oil just from the shale, it would come to over 3 Trillon barrels. Thats more oil than all other oil producing countrys in the world. We have enough shale rock in the Utah, Colorado and Wyoming area to make the U.S. totally free of foreign oil for over forty years. Enough time to improve on other sources of power like solar, wind, geothermal and nuclear. Canada has more oil than all other countries except Saudi Arabia. Canada just bought 5 of Global's machines for 1 million dollars apiece. One a year for 5 years. Why? because it's cheaper, safer and cleaner than drilling. We need to stop spending Billions on foreign oil when we have the oil right here in our own backyard. I don't understand why the people in this country, now that oil is under $100 a barrel again, are so eager to send all our money to countries that want to kill us. Make this country independent of foreign oil. Foreign oil is driving this country into the ground. I've been watching the stock price for Global for a few months and every time the price of oil comes down tens of thousands of shares are sold off driving the price down. That makes it harder for the company to do the R/D needed to keep improving on the product. I can't figure out why selling of shares and making it more difficult for Global to move forward and at the same time sending Billions of dollars overseas keeping of dependent on other countries, is perferable to becoming independent and going back to being a true leader in the world. Global Resource Corp along with the major oil companies and the mining companies can save this country. This new technolgy could create thousands of jobs and pump Millions of dollars back into our economy. http://www.globalresourcecorp.com/index.asp Check out the website for videos explaning the process. With the right backing and support this technology could save this country.
-- Posted via NewsDemon.com - Premium Uncensored Newsgroup Service ------->>>>>>http://www.NewsDemon.com<<<<<<------ Unlimited Access, Anonymous Accounts, Uncensored Broadband Access

On Oct 14, 6:55�am, attheb...@hotmail.com wrote:

... With the right backing and support this technology could save this country.

Why don't you publish the process here and allow everyone to use it for free?

This isn't something that you or I could use to go out in the backyard and make oil. Global Resource Corp makes a machine that breaks things down at the hydrocarbon level. It's like a giant microwave oven. Different items, tires, slurry,shale rock, things made from petroleum all break down at different frequency's. The machines would be sold to oil company's to use on their own wells and to company's in the recycling business. Canada's government bought 5 of the machines one a year for five years, to increase their supply of oil without having to drill.
-- Posted via NewsDemon.com - Premium Uncensored Newsgroup Service ------->>>>>>http://www.NewsDemon.com<<<<<<------ Unlimited Access, Anonymous Accounts, Uncensored Broadband Access

On Tue, 14 Oct 2008 15:41:24 GMT, atthebeep@hotmail.com wrote:

This isn't something that you or I could use to go out in the backyard and make oil. Global Resource Corp makes a machine that breaks things down at the hydrocarbon level. It's like a giant microwave oven. Different items, tires, slurry,shale rock, things made from petroleum all break down at different frequency's. The machines would be sold to oil company's to use on their own wells and to company's in the recycling business. Canada's government bought 5 of the machines one a year for five years, to increase their supply of oil without having to drill.

Cites please. The canadian government is not in the oil business, so I'd like to know where they are and what I paid for them - and how they are working. ** Posted from http://www.teranews.com **

<clare at snyder dot ontario dot canada> wrote in message

Cites please. The canadian government is not in the oil business, so I'd like to know where they are and what I paid for them - and how they are working.

According to a quick Google search, Clare's bullshit detector is essentially correct. The Canadian government does not seem to be directly involved in any such deal. I did find a deal where a Canadian company (Warwick) has obligated itself to buy five units over the next five years (see below). To be fair to the other poster, Warwick does hope for financing from the Canadian government, so Clare may still be required to ante up.
Vaughn
"On December 17, 2007 the Company has signed a letter of intent with Warwick Communications, Inc., ("Warwick"), a Canadian corporation based in Calgary, for an exclusive twenty-year license agreement, which enables Warwick to use the Company's microwave machinery to recover energy from oil, gas, mining and waste resources in Canada. Payment for the license will be by issuance of 2,000,000 shares of Warwick's common stock, together with two warrants; one to purchase 1.000,000 additional shares of Warwick's common stock at a price of US$1.50 and the other to purchase 750,000 shares of Warwick common stock at a price of US$1.00 per share. Execution of definitive agreement and issuance of the license is subject to a demonstration, acceptable to the licensee, of the continuous operation of the initial one ton machine, anticipated to occur by end of first quarter 2008. Under the license, when and if issued, Warwick will be obligated to purchase a minimum of one microwave machine each year for the next five years. This will total $25,000,000 or $5,000,000 per year. "

"Vaughn Simon" wrote in message

clare at snyder dot ontario dot canada> wrote in message
Cites please. The canadian government is not in the oil business, so I'd like to know where they are and what I paid for them - and how they are working.
According to a quick Google search, Clare's bullshit detector is essentially correct. The Canadian government does not seem to be directly involved in any such deal. I did find a deal where a Canadian company (Warwick) has obligated itself to buy five units over the next five years (see below). To be fair to the other poster, Warwick does hope for financing from the Canadian government, so Clare may still be required to ante up.
Vaughn
"On December 17, 2007 the Company has signed a letter of intent with Warwick Communications, Inc., ("Warwick"), a Canadian corporation based in Calgary, for an exclusive twenty-year license agreement, which enables Warwick to use the Company's microwave machinery to recover energy from oil, gas, mining and waste resources in Canada. Payment for the license will be by issuance of 2,000,000 shares of Warwick's common stock, together with two warrants; one to purchase 1.000,000 additional shares of Warwick's common stock at a price of US$1.50 and the other to purchase 750,000 shares of Warwick common stock at a price of US$1.00 per share. Execution of definitive agreement and issuance of the license is subject to a demonstration, acceptable to the licensee, of the continuous operation of the initial one ton machine, anticipated to occur by end of first quarter 2008. Under the license, when and if issued, Warwick will be obligated to purchase a minimum of one microwave machine each year for the next five years. This will total $25,000,000 or $5,000,000 per year. "

Let me get this straight, this $5million microwave machine breaks down raw/crude and anything made from it into a lighter form of petrol? It does this by bombarding the target substance with the proper freq of microwaves? Wouldn't that heat the target, no matter what microwave frequency used?
Haven't oil companys been heating some deposites, too help extract oil, for some time now? Isn't heating shale insitu part of the normal process?
My question would be how much energy does this $5M microwave suck up when you turn it on? How much does that cost?
Oh and did you know that Mercedes has been selling cars with four or more modified Wankle turbines per car? They pull the seatbelts tight if there is an accident. Of course, I could write a story that never mentions the seatbelts but make it a big issue that this major car maker will be shipping cars with thousands of these rotary turbines equiped .
Luck; Ken (Still no 64bit OE Spell checker)

wrote in message

Global Resource Corporation, a small company in New Jersey that has built and successfully tested a machine that extracts oil, diesel fuel and fuel oil from waste products like used tires, plastics, tar sands, slurry, shale rock and capped off oil wells. There are lots of companies that do similar things. This company is the only one that uses a microwave technology that uses NO water and has zero emissions. The whole proccess is done in a vacuum. Extracting oil from oil shale has been around for a long time. It's just to expensive using the old methods. The microwaves break down the shale rock, old tires, etc... at the hydrocarbon levels and the only thing left is the oil, diesel and gas. In and interview with the founder, Frank Pringle, on FOX News he said that he takes the diesel fuel straight from the machine and pours it right into his car. No refining required.

You saw it on FOX news? Geee! It MUST be true.

You won't see it on CNN because this process would be good for the country and Democrats don't want any thing good for the people as long as a Republican is in charge.
-- Posted via NewsDemon.com - Premium Uncensored Newsgroup Service ------->>>>>>http://www.NewsDemon.com<<<<<<------ Unlimited Access, Anonymous Accounts, Uncensored Broadband Access

wrote in message

You won't see it on CNN because this process would be good for the country and Democrats don't want any thing good for the people as long as a Republican is in charge.

Wow! You right wingers are really wacko. You obviously know nothing about what democrats want.
But you WILL find out.
And then some of you might begin to think.

I didn't say the Democrats NEVER want anything good for the people. I said they didn't want anything good to happen while a Republican was in charge. Do you really think the Dems did everything they could to turn the housing market around or lower the price of gas, 6 months ago? Of course not, they wanted us to keep spiraling down until after the election so they could say look what the republicans did to you. I'm not the one that brought politics into this thread. I simply said that Fox did an interview with the head of Global Resources Corp. If CNN had done the interview I would have posted it.
I don't care about politics, the only thing having me lean more toward the Republican side, this time, is that Bush was pushing the oil shale technology and the Democrats where trying to block it. I'm sure after the election, win or lose, the Dems will be all for alternative energy sources.
Next time you want to respond to a post have someone explain it to you first.
-- Posted via NewsDemon.com - Premium Uncensored Newsgroup Service ------->>>>>>http://www.NewsDemon.com<<<<<<------ Unlimited Access, Anonymous Accounts, Uncensored Broadband Access

atthebeep@hotmail.com wrote:

I didn't say the Democrats NEVER want anything good for the people. I said they didn't want anything good to happen while a Republican was in charge. Do you really think the Dems did everything they could to turn the housing market around or lower the price of gas, 6 months ago? Of course not,

This is civics lesson for you, the Republicans have been running the entire show for the last eight years, the democrats have had one seat majority since January 2007, and republicans have broken all records filibustering bills THEY don't want passed.....

they wanted us to keep spiraling down until after the election so they could say look what the republicans did to you.

Well it's true, the republicans did do it to you.......

I'm not the one that brought politics into this thread. I simply said that Fox did an interview with the head of Global Resources Corp. If CNN had done the interview I would have posted it.
I don't care about politics, the only thing having me lean more toward the Republican side, this time, is that Bush was pushing the oil shale technology and the Democrats where trying to block it.

Nobody is blocking oil shale research, only the severe environmental hazards of conventional extraction.

I'm sure after the election, win or lose, the Dems will be all for alternative energy sources.

They already are, Obama has talked about it for months

Next time you want to respond to a post have someone explain it to you first.
-- Posted via NewsDemon.com - Premium Uncensored Newsgroup Service ------->>>>>>http://www.NewsDemon.com<<<<<<------ Unlimited Access, Anonymous Accounts, Uncensored Broadband Access

"Balanced View" wrote in message

atthebeep@hotmail.com wrote: I didn't say the Democrats NEVER want anything good for the people. I said they didn't want anything good to happen while a Republican was in charge. Do you really think the Dems did everything they could to turn the housing market around or lower the price of gas, 6 months ago? Of course not,
This is civics lesson for you, the Republicans have been running the entire show for the last eight years, the democrats have had one seat majority since January 2007, and republicans have broken all records filibustering bills THEY don't want passed.....
they wanted us to keep spiraling down until after the election so they could say look what the republicans did to you.
Well it's true, the republicans did do it to you.......
I'm not the one that brought politics into this thread. I simply said that Fox did an interview with the head of Global Resources Corp. If CNN had done the interview I would have posted it.
I don't care about politics, the only thing having me lean more toward the Republican side, this time, is that Bush was pushing the oil shale technology and the Democrats where trying to block it.
Nobody is blocking oil shale research, only the severe environmental hazards of conventional extraction.
I'm sure after the election, win or lose, the Dems will be all for alternative energy sources.
They already are, Obama has talked about it for months Next time you want to respond to a post have someone explain it to you first.
-- Posted via NewsDemon.com - Premium Uncensored Newsgroup Service ------->>>>>>http://www.NewsDemon.com<<<<<<------ Unlimited Access, Anonymous Accounts, Uncensored Broadband Access

Well not so balanced after all. Only a true partisan could view what Nancy Peliosi and Harry Read have been up to, in the manner you described. The only reason the gutless wonder Republican legislators have had any sort of "control" is that with a Republican President it takes a super majority to pass legislation against a veto. The Dems controll everything, bills can't get to or through commity or even put up for consideration except by the Demicratic leadership's action.
One thing about the way things look right now, when Obama is in, the Dems can no longer hide behind the lie that they couldn't act because the minority Republicans wouldn't let them.
Luck; Ken

Ken Maltby wrote:

"Balanced View" wrote in message
atthebeep@hotmail.com wrote:
I didn't say the Democrats NEVER want anything good for the people. I said they didn't want anything good to happen while a Republican was in charge. Do you really think the Dems did everything they could to turn the housing market around or lower the price of gas, 6 months ago? Of course not,
This is civics lesson for you, the Republicans have been running the entire show for the last eight years, the democrats have had one seat majority since January 2007, and republicans have broken all records filibustering bills THEY don't want passed.....
they wanted us to keep spiraling down until after the election so they could say look what the republicans did to you.
Well it's true, the republicans did do it to you.......
I'm not the one that brought politics into this thread. I simply said that Fox did an interview with the head of Global Resources Corp. If CNN had done the interview I would have posted it.
I don't care about politics, the only thing having me lean more toward the Republican side, this time, is that Bush was pushing the oil shale technology and the Democrats where trying to block it.
Nobody is blocking oil shale research, only the severe environmental hazards of conventional extraction.

I'm sure after the election, win or lose, the Dems will be all for alternative energy sources.
They already are, Obama has talked about it for months
Next time you want to respond to a post have someone explain it to you first.
-- Posted via NewsDemon.com - Premium Uncensored Newsgroup Service ------->>>>>>http://www.NewsDemon.com<<<<<<------ Unlimited Access, Anonymous Accounts, Uncensored Broadband Access

Well not so balanced after all. Only a true partisan could view what Nancy Peliosi and Harry Read have been up to, in the manner you described. The only reason the gutless wonder Republican legislators have had any sort of "control" is that with a Republican President it takes a super majority to pass legislation against a veto. The Dems controll everything, bills can't get to or through commity or even put up for consideration except by the Demicratic leadership's action.

Hardly, I'm not an American citizen and don't live in the USA, which gives me a very clear view. What part about a two term Republican president with Republicans controlling all branches of government until January 2007 do you not understand? Just what legislation have Democrats been able to pass between January 2007 and April 2008 that would have caused the entire collapse of the world financial system?

One thing about the way things look right now, when Obama is in, the Dems can no longer hide behind the lie that they couldn't act because the minority Republicans wouldn't let them.
Luck; Ken

The truth is the Republicans have broken all records for filibusters in any single session on record House Democrats pass a bill, but Senate Democrats, facing a filibuster by the Republican minority, fail to get the 60 votes needed to end debate.

"Balanced View" wrote in message

Hardly, I'm not an American citizen and don't live in the USA, which gives me a very clear view.

Nonsense. For one thing, I have been reading you long enough to know that your views are filtered through a profound xenophobia nourished by a set of rigid stereotypical assumptions concerning people that you have never met.
Your distant location, different influences, and differing interests may give you have a *different* view compared to someone who lives in the US, but don't delude yourself into thinking it is *clearer* or somehow better.
Vaughn

Vaughn Simon wrote:

Your distant location, different influences, and differing interests may give you have a *different* view compared to someone who lives in the US, but don't delude yourself into thinking it is *clearer* or somehow better.

Which is not to say that (at least some) USAnians don't find those views (at least sometimes) interesting and occasionally amusing.
I've found it interesting that, in general, those with the strongest opinions are the same group of people who never -- or almost never -- ask the questions that might inform those opinions. :-)
-- Morris Dovey DeSoto Solar DeSoto, Iowa USA http://www.iedu.com/DeSoto/