Date: Sun Dec 11, 2005 9:31 pm. By: Max
wrote in message
There is enough oil in Alaska to US requirements for 200 years at growing trends, more oil than currently exists in Saudi Arabia. However, this knowledge is suppressed by vested interests and the desire to manufacture a myth of oil scarcity.
What kind of oil? In the North Sea the reserves of heavy oil dwarf those of light oil. But the cost and utility of extracting heavy oil, compared to loght, make it uneconomic. When I was doing my PhD, with oil at $20, we estimated that oil had to exceed $60 a barrel before the heavy oil was economic to extract. I don't know what the comparable figures are today.
Light oil is of relativley low viscosity, so it flows easily; it contains a greater proportion of low(ish) molecular weight hydrocarbons, so that it is easy to process for valuable hydrocarbons. Heavy oil, by contrast, dpes not flow easily, so that flow promoters are required - water floods, in-situ combustion, etc. In addition, the current refineries will need upgrading if they are not to produce a lot of tar & other low-usage, low-profit, material.
Your reading on Alaska may be the same - confusing total oil reserves with economic oil reserves.
The US government isn't what you think it is. Back in 1871 there was a legal manouvre whereby a corporation called "THE UNITED STATES" was formed in Columbia. Somehow this corporation took over the US and the original US and works to further its own interests rather than those of the people. See following article which explains the situation.
So the US is owned by European private banks; meanwhile, European governments ow large sums to the USA. My personal scan of the documents is that it misrepresents the documents & rationale behind the District of Columbia.
Things I have read about include - 1. Harold Holt being murdered because he was going to go ahead with developing nuclear energy plants for use in industry and regenerate the economy. http://www.haroldholt.net That's not to say that this theory is true, but its as good a theory as any and there are some credible people behind it.
More commonly, people are allegeldy murdred for getting in the way of the uptake of nuclear power. Bit of a bummer - oppose it, the nuclear barons kill you; promote it, the oil barons kill you.
The murder of PM Harold Holt http://www.haroldholt.net gives insight into the minds of the power players who will go to any lengths to protect their cash cow, the oil industry. It is claimed that Rockefeller oil is behind it.
An oil company so powerful it was split up at the start of the 20th Century by the US Government, an organisation which is allegedly created to run teh country in the interests of, amongst others, Rockefeller Oil.
2. Nuclear energy can now be processed where the waste is broken down in a very short time, not the thousands of years we are told which is a scare campaign.
Any claim that a fundamental law of physics has been broken is usually wrong.
Regardless, there has been much suppression of free energy.
Resources: Patents Most of these patents can be viewed at www.delphion.com/. This is a sample of inventions that produce free energy: Tesla: USP #685,957 (1901)
Outside patent protection. If the patent works then anyone can proceed to create free energy. However, 'free energy' violates the law of thermodynamics. I understand that the UK Patents Office used to allow such patents through, but eventually changed ther policy to 'bring in a working example and we'll grant the patent.' So finding old patents that purport to break the laws of thermodynamics is not a problem - it reflects the willingness of patent officers to humour the inventro, rather than a reflection that the patent can deliver on its claims. And remember - if a patent does not reveal all the information needed to build the claimed item then that makes the patent invalid.
Freedman: USP #2,796,345 (1957) Richardson: USP #4,077,001 (1978) Frenette: USP #4,143,639 (1979) Perkins: USP #4,424,797 (1984) Gray: USP #4,595,975 (1986) Meyer: USP #4,936,961 (1990) Chambers (Xogen): USP #6,126,794 (1998).
4. Scarcity increases price and OPEC controls production to keep prices at a certain level.
So? This has been the case since the founding of OPEC.
I'm not that familiar with how OPEC works, but just assume its one of those NWO orgs like CFR, UN, WHO and IMF.
Nope. OPEC is a cartel, run to benefit the oil producers. Given how disgracefully the Seven Sisters exploited OPEC oil reserves OPEC has done the owners of the oil a good service. The 'West' dislikes this, since 'they' (YOU, pre-193 at least) want oil produced in quantities & prices that make energy efficiency too expensive to be worth investing in.