Looking for a UPS Design That Doesn't Overheat Batteries

In article , Roy L. Fuchs wrote:

Nope. Fuel has to be delivered (in atomized form), and an ignition source. Compression of mere air alone does nothing

Obviously this guy never heard of a Diesel injected engine..........

On Thu, 08 Jun 2006 01:54:22 GMT, Roy L. Fuchs wrote:

On Thu, 08 Jun 2006 00:06:03 +1000, Peter Dettmann peter@aardvark.net.au> Gave us:
On Mon, 05 Jun 2006 07:43:53 GMT, Roy L. Fuchs roylfuchs@urfargingicehole.org> wrote:
On Mon, 05 Jun 2006 04:19:55 GMT, no one that you know nooneshome@shaw.ca> Gave us:
Trus me when it's minus forty it takes more than a few seconds to cook a starter.........but thank you for your concern
Look, you top posting Usenet RETARD!
Within a few hundred milliseconds of applying current, the wires involved in your scenario would not be caring ANYTHING at all about the outside temperature.
But thanks for trying to squirm away from reality.
It is a well established FACT that non rotating starter motors under power can catastrophically fry rather quickly.
Put THAT in your keyhole and crank it, you top posting dipshit.
Just as I thought, you have never actually tried it,
Yes... YOU THOUGHT... The problem is, your brain isn't worth a shit. It is an established FACT, you stupid fucktard. Commutator bar motors can fry windings when they are not turning, yet are under power. Do you deny this FACT?

Simplistically the answer is Yes and No. Obviously it depends onthe circumstances. Here, the whole point was that the duration would be limited. Also the situation was where the battery was so stuffed it could not even turn the starter. How would you assume an explosive energy to come from an effectively temporarily dead battery?

nor have you the nous or expertise to pontificate on the subject.
Yet one more piece of shit remark from the brainless twit. Here's a clue... You do NOT know a goddamned thing about what I do or do not have expertise in.

True, I only know your limitations in those subjects in which you display your level of expertise. I am sure you are expert in other fields ..... but certainly not in manners, and somewhat limited on the present subject.
Peter Dettmann

Too little knowledge is a dangerous thing,
Go look in the mirror when you say that, dipshit.
and your slip is showing.
Yet another bent perception from the 2 inch thick skulled twit.

I guess he's older that a diesel.
You wrote:

In article , Roy L. Fuchs wrote:
Nope. Fuel has to be delivered (in atomized form), and an ignition source. Compression of mere air alone does nothing
Obviously this guy never heard of a Diesel injected engine..........

On Thu, 08 Jun 2006 15:22:21 GMT, "JoeSP" Gave us:

"Bud--" wrote in message However I would be in danger of being seriously considered a retard if I continued this dialogue with you any further.
He is often (as here) a troll. Please don't continue.
Getting a rise out of people by provoking them is his only goal. It's a pathetic pastime if you ask me.
You are so retarded that you cannot see that I am correct and the

asswipe that puts pliers across his battery is more retarded even than you two? Get a clue, dipshits.

On Thu, 08 Jun 2006 19:41:51 GMT, You Gave us:

In article , Roy L. Fuchs wrote:
Nope. Fuel has to be delivered (in atomized form), and an ignition source. Compression of mere air alone does nothing
Obviously this guy never heard of a Diesel injected engine..........

I know more about internal combustion engines than a retarded twit like you ever will, including diesels. Diesels do not require an atomized fuel charge at all. Only pressure.
Sorry, liar boy... your "ten cylinder" car is NOT a diesel.